Compliance
SOX Compliance
by Architecture, Not by Policy.
When auditors ask 'can anyone edit a posted entry?' the answer is architecturally no. Not 'we have a policy against it' — the system physically cannot do it.
The difference between policy and architecture.
Most ERPs rely on policies and permissions to enforce SOX compliance. Permissions can be misconfigured. Policies can be bypassed. Architecture cannot.
Uno360's financial records are append-only. Posted entries cannot be edited or deleted — ever. Debits must equal credits, enforced at the database level. This isn't a setting. It's a physical constraint.
How Uno360 Delivers Compliance.
| Capability | How It Works |
|---|---|
| Immutable Ledger | Posted entries cannot be edited or deleted. Corrections via reversing entries only. |
| Double-Entry Enforcement | Database constraint: sum(debits) = sum(credits) per entry. |
| Segregation of Duties | System-enforced — same person cannot create and approve. Not a permission, an invariant. |
| AI Decision Logging | Every AI categorization, anomaly flag, and suggestion logged with confidence score and reasoning. |
| 7-Year Retention | Configurable retention with compliant archival and purge. |
| Audit Evidence Packages | Generated on demand for external auditors. |
From weeks of evidence gathering
to one click.
Before
Audit preparation
2–4 weeks
Cost
$200–400K/year
Institutional knowledge
In people's heads
SOX documentation
Manually assembled evidence binders
After
Audit preparation
2–4 days
Cost reduction
30–50%
Knowledge
In the system permanently
SOX documentation
Auto-generated from communication trails
Revenue Recognition in Plain English.
US GAAP revenue recognition (ASC 606) evaluated by natural language rules. 'Recognize SaaS revenue ratably over subscription period.' Every recognition decision documented with reasoning and confidence score.